From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dax: Page invalidation fixes
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:01:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161003130144.GS6457@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160930085905.GF22381@infradead.org>
On Fri 30-09-16 01:59:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 06:43:29PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > these patches fix races when invalidating hole pages in DAX mappings. See
> > changelogs for details. The series is based on my patches to write-protect
> > DAX PTEs because we really need to closely track dirtiness (and cleanness!)
> > of radix tree entries in DAX mappings in order to avoid discarding valid
> > dirty bits leading to missed cache flushes on fsync(2).
>
> Except for the VM magic I don't feel qualified to review this looks fine
> to me. But don't we need to switch ext4 away from going through the DIO
> path first before the limited invalidation is effective there?
> Otherwise we'll still get the full range invalidation from
> generic_file_direct_write?
After patch 5/6 the additional invalidation we get from
generic_file_direct_write() for ext4 is racy but not doing any harm since
we later do a reliable invalidation directly from dax_io() which patch 6/6
takes care to update. So it will be inefficient but it will work. Once ext4
is converted we get rid of this redundancy.
BTW I have locally patches that avoid this inefficiency for ext4 but I
figured there's no point in posting them since we want to convert ext4 to
iomap interface sooner rather than later.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 16:43 [PATCH 0/6] dax: Page invalidation fixes Jan Kara
2016-09-27 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] dax: Do not warn about BH_New buffers Jan Kara
2016-09-30 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext2: Return BH_New buffers for zeroed blocks Jan Kara
2016-09-30 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Remove clearing of BH_New bit " Jan Kara
2016-09-30 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 16:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: Set BH_New for allocated DAX blocks in __xfs_get_blocks() Jan Kara
2016-09-27 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 17:17 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-28 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-03 14:44 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-28 2:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-03 14:42 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-03 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 16:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: Invalidate DAX radix tree entries only if appropriate Jan Kara
2016-09-28 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-03 14:52 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-30 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-03 12:56 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-27 16:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] dax: Avoid page invalidation races and unnecessary radix tree traversals Jan Kara
2016-09-28 0:20 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-03 14:58 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-03 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-30 8:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-03 15:02 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-30 8:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] dax: Page invalidation fixes Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-03 13:01 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161003130144.GS6457@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).