From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] posix_acl: Clear SGID bit when setting file permissions
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:35:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012173549.GA120419@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161012071651.GB13896@quack2.suse.cz>
Cc +fstests@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:16:51AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue 11-10-16 16:11:01, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:42:48PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > When file permissions are modified via chmod(2) and the user is not in
> > > the owning group or capable of CAP_FSETID, the setgid bit is cleared in
> > > inode_change_ok(). Setting a POSIX ACL via setxattr(2) sets the file
> > > permissions as well as the new ACL, but doesn't clear the setgid bit in
> > > a similar way; this allows to bypass the check in chmod(2). Fix that.
> > >
> >
> > This patch is causing xfstests generic/314 to fail. This test is supposed to
> > test "SGID inheritance on subdirectories", and the failure is because subdir2
> > unexpectedly ends up without a SGID bit. This happens because the following
> > commands now result in the SGID bit on the parent directory "$TEST_DIR/$seq-dir"
> > being cleared rather than set:
> >
> > mkdir $TEST_DIR/$seq-dir
> > chown $qa_user:12345 $TEST_DIR/$seq-dir
> > chmod 2775 $TEST_DIR/$seq-dir
> > su $qa_user -c "setfacl -m u:$qa_user:rwx,d:u:$qa_user:rwx $TEST_DIR/$seq-dir"
> >
> > Is this the expected behavior now?
>
> Yes, this is expected behavior - $qa_user is not in group 12345 and thus he
> could not set sgid bit himself. So once mode is modified by the user (and
> the setfacl command you presented will touch file mode) sgid bit is expected
> to be cleared - this is to be consistent with the behavior when:
>
> chmod 2755 $TEST_DIR/$seq-dir
>
> done by $qa_user would clear the sgid bit as well.
>
> Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
Is this true even though we're talking about a directory, not a regular file?
>From the POSIX man page for chmod (man 3 chmod):
If the calling process does not have appropriate privileges, and if the
group ID of the file does not match the effective group ID or one of
the supplementary group IDs and if the file is a regular file, bit
S_ISGID (set-group-ID on execution) in the file's mode shall be cleared
upon successful return from chmod().
Note the "is a regular file". Granted, Linux already cleared the SGID bit on
directories too, so your patch is consistent with that existing behavior. But
if "directories too" is really the "correct" behavior, it looks like there need
to be xfstests updates:
* generic/314, which is supposed to test SGID inheritance, should be
updated to not depend on any specific SGID clearing behavior. As-is
this test is failing.
* generic/375, which is a new test that is supposed to test
SGID clearing, possibly should test both a regular file and a
directory. Right now it only tests a regular file.
Thoughts on this?
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 15:42 [PATCH v2 RESEND] posix_acl: Clear SGID bit when setting file permissions Jan Kara
2016-09-20 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-22 9:10 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-20 16:54 ` Jeff Layton
2016-10-11 23:11 ` Eric Biggers
2016-10-12 7:16 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-12 17:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2016-10-12 21:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-12 21:30 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161012173549.GA120419@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).