From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:54:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161114085419.GC2524@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161111202547.GA1569@linux.intel.com>
On Fri 11-11-16 13:25:47, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:08:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Currently mapping of blocks for DAX writes happen with
> > EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO flag set. That has a result that each
> > ext4_map_blocks() call creates a separate written extent, although it
> > could be merged to the neighboring extents in the extent tree. The
> > reason for using this flag is that in case the extent is unwritten, we
> > need to convert it to written one and zero it out. However this "convert
> > mapped range to written" operation is already implemented by
> > ext4_map_blocks() for the case of data writes into unwritten extent. So
> > just use flags for that mode of operation, simplify the code, and avoid
> > unnecessary split extents.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> The code that this patch modifies was just introduced in the previous patch.
> Is there a reason to keep both patches, or would it be cleaner just to squash
> them and have one patch that introduces the code as you intend for it to end
> up?
Well, the previous patch just mostly moved the block allocation logic from
dedicated DAX get_block function into iomap_begin(). This patch changes the
block allocation logic so I prefer to keep them separate - mostly for the
sake of documenting the change how allocation of blocks for DAX works in the
changelog.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 11:08 [PATCH 0/11 v2] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Factor out checks from ext4_file_write_iter() Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: Let S_DAX set only if DAX is really supported Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:46 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-11 10:08 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-11 17:56 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: Convert DAX reads to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:54 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-11 10:17 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-11 17:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Use iomap for zeroing blocks in DAX mode Jan Kara
2016-11-10 22:05 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: DAX iomap write support Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes Jan Kara
2016-11-11 20:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-14 8:54 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] dax: Introduce IOMAP_FAULT flag Jan Kara
2016-11-08 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-09 15:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: Convert DAX faults to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] ext4: Rip out DAX handling from direct IO path Jan Kara
2016-11-16 17:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-17 9:41 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] ext2: Use iomap_zero_range() for zeroing truncated page in DAX path Jan Kara
2016-11-16 17:31 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] dax: Rip out get_block based IO support Jan Kara
2016-11-16 18:11 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-17 9:45 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-08 23:17 ` [PATCH 0/11 v2] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Dave Chinner
2016-11-09 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-09 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161114085419.GC2524@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).