linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:54:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161114085419.GC2524@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161111202547.GA1569@linux.intel.com>

On Fri 11-11-16 13:25:47, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:08:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Currently mapping of blocks for DAX writes happen with
> > EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO flag set. That has a result that each
> > ext4_map_blocks() call creates a separate written extent, although it
> > could be merged to the neighboring extents in the extent tree.  The
> > reason for using this flag is that in case the extent is unwritten, we
> > need to convert it to written one and zero it out. However this "convert
> > mapped range to written" operation is already implemented by
> > ext4_map_blocks() for the case of data writes into unwritten extent. So
> > just use flags for that mode of operation, simplify the code, and avoid
> > unnecessary split extents.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> 
> The code that this patch modifies was just introduced in the previous patch.
> Is there a reason to keep both patches, or would it be cleaner just to squash
> them and have one patch that introduces the code as you intend for it to end
> up?

Well, the previous patch just mostly moved the block allocation logic from
dedicated DAX get_block function into iomap_begin(). This patch changes the
block allocation logic so I prefer to keep them separate - mostly for the
sake of documenting the change how allocation of blocks for DAX works in the
changelog.

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-14  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 11:08 [PATCH 0/11 v2] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Factor out checks from ext4_file_write_iter() Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:25   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: Let S_DAX set only if DAX is really supported Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:46   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-11 10:08     ` Jan Kara
2016-11-11 17:56       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: Convert DAX reads to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:54   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-11 10:17     ` Jan Kara
2016-11-11 17:57       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Use iomap for zeroing blocks in DAX mode Jan Kara
2016-11-10 22:05   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: DAX iomap write support Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes Jan Kara
2016-11-11 20:25   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-14  8:54     ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] dax: Introduce IOMAP_FAULT flag Jan Kara
2016-11-08 23:21   ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-09 15:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: Convert DAX faults to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] ext4: Rip out DAX handling from direct IO path Jan Kara
2016-11-16 17:13   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-17  9:41     ` Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] ext2: Use iomap_zero_range() for zeroing truncated page in DAX path Jan Kara
2016-11-16 17:31   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] dax: Rip out get_block based IO support Jan Kara
2016-11-16 18:11   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-17  9:45     ` Jan Kara
2016-11-08 23:17 ` [PATCH 0/11 v2] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Dave Chinner
2016-11-09 15:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-09 23:22     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161114085419.GC2524@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).