From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:57482 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752097AbcLIIW6 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:22:58 -0500
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 00:22:53 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: mfasheh@versity.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jlbec@evilplan.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
        ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] ocfs2: wire up {clone,copy,dedupe}_range
Message-ID: <20161209082253.GA10811@infradead.org>
References: <148064006267.14039.3248903225701175868.stgit@birch.djwong.org>
 <20161209073213.GK16807@birch.djwong.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161209073213.GK16807@birch.djwong.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:32:13PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> It's been a week and nobody's written in any objections.  Andrew, could
> this go into linux-next for some soak time?

I'm mostly fine with my series, but I would much prefer if this went
on top of my patch to implement the copy -> clone fallback in the core
to avoid creating annoying merge conflicts.