From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59916 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751670AbcLJBxE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 20:53:04 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:52:57 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , mfasheh@versity.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] ocfs2: wire up {clone,copy,dedupe}_range Message-ID: <20161210015257.GE1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <148064006267.14039.3248903225701175868.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20161209073213.GK16807@birch.djwong.org> <20161209082253.GA10811@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161209082253.GA10811@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 12:22:53AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:32:13PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > It's been a week and nobody's written in any objections. Andrew, could > > this go into linux-next for some soak time? > > I'm mostly fine with my series, but I would much prefer if this went > on top of my patch to implement the copy -> clone fallback in the core > to avoid creating annoying merge conflicts. What was the latest of the patch in question?