From: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@tuxera.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 9pfs hangs since 4.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:04:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170104220447.74f2265d@duuni> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170104014753.GE1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 01:47:53 +0000
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:34:50AM +0200, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
>
> > I got these logs from the server & client with 9p tracepoints enabled:
> >
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dezgeg/02447100b3182167403099fe7de4d941/raw/3772e408ddf586fb662ac9148fc10943529a6b99/dmesg%2520with%25209p%2520trace
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dezgeg/e1e0c7f354042e1d9bdf7e9135934a65/raw/3a0e3b4f7a5229fd0be032c6839b578d47a21ce4/qemu.log
> >
>
> Lovely...
>
> 27349:out 8 0001 TSTATFS, tag 1
> 27350:out 12 0001 TLOPEN, tag 1
> 27351:complete 9 0001 RSTATFS, tag 1
> 27352:complete 13 0001 RLOPEN, tag 1
>
> 27677:out 8 0001 TSTATFS, tag 1
> 27678:out 12 0001 TLOPEN, tag 1
> 27679:complete 9 0001 RSTATFS, tag 1
> 27680:complete 13 0001 RLOPEN, tag 1
>
> 29667:out 8 0001 TSTATFS, tag 1
> 29668:out 110 0001 TWALK, tag 1
> 29669:complete 9 0001 RSTATFS, tag 1
> 29670:complete 7 0001 RLERROR, tag 1
>
> 42317:out 110 0001 TWALK, tag 1
> 42318:out 8 0001 TSTATFS, tag 1
> 42319:complete 9 0001 RSTATFS, tag 1
> 42320:complete 7 0001 RERROR, tag 1
>
> Those are outright protocol violations: tag can be reused only after either
> a reply bearing the same tag has arrived *or* TFLUSH for that tag had been
> issued and successful (type == RFLUSH) reply bearing the tag of that TFLUSH
> has arrived. Your log doesn't contain any TFLUSH (108) at all, so it should've
> been plain and simple "no reuse until server sends a reply with matching tag".
>
Argh, I had completely forgotten there is another 9p mount involved, so the log
is mixed between the two mounts. Apologies, there is now a new trace attached
with the V9fsState pointer dumped in the mix as well.
> Otherwise the the dump looks sane. In the end all issued requests had been
> served, so it's not as if the client had been waiting for a free tag or for
> a response to be produced by the server.
>
> Interesting... dmesg doesn't seem to contain the beginning of the 9P trace -
> only 89858 out of 108818 in the dump, even though it claims to have lost
> only 4445 events. [...]
Here's logs that should be complete this time:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dezgeg/08629d4c8ca79da794bc087e5951e518/raw/a1a82b9bc24e5282c82beb43a9dc91974ffcf75a/9p.qemu.log
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dezgeg/1d5f1cc0647e336c59989fc62780eb2e/raw/d7623755a895b0441c608ddba366d20bbf47ab0b/9p.dmesg.log
>
> Interesting... Which version of qemu/what arguments are you using there?
This is QEMU 2.7.0, with these on the server side:
-virtfs local,path=/nix/store,security_model=none,mount_tag=store
-virtfs local,path=$TMPDIR/xchg,security_model=none,mount_tag=xchg
and on the client side:
store on /nix/store type 9p (rw,relatime,dirsync,trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,cache=loose)
xchg on /tmp/xchg type 9p (rw,relatime,dirsync,trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,cache=loose)
'store' is the one receiving the hammering, 'xchg' I think is mostly sitting idle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-04 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 19:50 9pfs hangs since 4.7 Tuomas Tynkkynen
2016-11-29 16:39 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2016-12-02 20:11 ` Tuomas Tynkkynen
2017-01-02 8:20 ` Tuomas Tynkkynen
2017-01-02 16:23 ` Al Viro
2017-01-03 23:34 ` Tuomas Tynkkynen
2017-01-04 1:47 ` Al Viro
2017-01-04 20:04 ` Tuomas Tynkkynen [this message]
2017-01-04 23:01 ` Al Viro
2017-01-06 13:52 ` [V9fs-developer] " Greg Kurz
2017-01-07 6:26 ` Al Viro
2017-01-07 15:10 ` Greg Kurz
2017-01-07 17:19 ` Al Viro
2017-01-07 18:15 ` Al Viro
2017-01-08 5:46 ` Al Viro
2017-01-10 8:16 ` Greg Kurz
2017-01-09 18:29 ` Greg Kurz
2017-01-09 18:39 ` Tuomas Tynkkynen
2017-01-09 20:05 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170104220447.74f2265d@duuni \
--to=tuomas@tuxera.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).