From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] splice: introduce FMODE_SPLICE_READ and FMODE_SPLICE_WRITE
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:16:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112091620.GV1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484137213.2621.6.camel@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:20:13AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 10:51 +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Introduce FMODE_SPLICE_READ and FMODE_SPLICE_WRITE. These modes check
> > whether it is legal to read or write a file using splice. Both get
> > automatically set on regular files and are not checked when a 'struct
> > fileoperations' includes the splice_{read,write} methods.
> >
>
> Could you add a description of the problem that this solves? I assume
> you hit a problem trying to splice to/from a non-regular file, but it'd
> be good to know what that problem was.
Insane ->write() instances, basically. I'm not at all convinced that it's
a good idea - sure, we can go and mark sane ones as such one-by-one, but
it's a _lot_ of code churn and insane ones are very few. Moreover, I would
argue that the right way to handle that is to reject any new instances of
that insanity - splice or no splice, write(2) that includes userland pointers
in payload and dereferences them is not fit to live. /dev/sg, /dev/bsg
and infinibarf are examples of really bad APIs; sure, we can't kill them
off (at least /dev/sg is used by a bunch of userland programs and all of
them expect that semantics), but that doesn't excuse any new drivers trying
to introduce the same.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 9:51 [PATCH RESEND] splice: introduce FMODE_SPLICE_READ and FMODE_SPLICE_WRITE Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 12:20 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-11 13:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 9:16 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112091620.GV1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).