From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49388 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751899AbdAaMZb (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:25:31 -0500
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:09:43 +0100
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
        Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, guaneryu@gmail.com,
        ltp@lists.linux.it, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: utimensat EACCES vs. EPERM in 4.8+
Message-ID: <20170131120929.GE29227@rei.lan>
References: <18a5b416-ad6a-e679-d993-af7ffa0dcc10@redhat.com>
 <CAOssrKfb1-C8c=9bAPiairh+Lyf=w28r+RjSXTLQcQZ-=eWMRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKgNAkjTkBMY0wrj3wsH39YF=bHp=8mbYrXkSPzn0X4ezfso1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <280513509.810300.1484639500985.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20170117075702.GB10417@rei.lan>
 <CAOssrKd32K-e5794m9KOjrMm_E3VZ7P-bvZW2P8UpGFTOgi8JQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <cb15e28d-8c5e-e3d7-441a-9165c4e57133@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cb15e28d-8c5e-e3d7-441a-9165c4e57133@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hi!
> All of this said, I still don't know whether reverting the patch
> is warranted...

Ping.

What shall we do with the failing testcase?

I guess that since the discussion withered the patch will stay in kernel
as it is and the manual needs to be updated...

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz