linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203144756.GC5844@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170202182802.GH27291@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Thu 02-02-17 18:28:02, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:48:17PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
> > > 	* ->page_mkwrite() instances sometimes return VM_FAULT_RETRY; AFAICS,
> > > it's only (ab)used there as 'not zero, but doesn't contain any error bits';
> > > VM_FAULT_RETRY from that source does *not* reach handle_mm_fault() callers,
> > > right?
> > 
> > I can see only Lustre doing it and IMHO it is abuse. VM_FAULT_RETRY is used
> > for mmap_sem latency reduction when paging in pages and so not everybody
> > handles it. If a handler wants to simply retry the fault, returning
> > VM_FAULT_NOPAGE is a more common way to do that...
> 
> /* Convert errno to return value from ->page_mkwrite() call */
> static inline int block_page_mkwrite_return(int err)
> {
>         if (err == 0)
>                 return VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
>         if (err == -EFAULT)
>                 return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
>         if (err == -ENOMEM)
>                 return VM_FAULT_OOM;
>         if (err == -EAGAIN)
>                 return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
>         /* -ENOSPC, -EDQUOT, -EIO ... */
>         return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> }
> 
> and a bunch of ->page_mkwrite() instances using that.  However, the only
> callers of ->page_mkwrite() are wp_page_shared()->do_page_mkwrite() and
> do_shared_fault()->do_page_mkwrite().  do_page_mkwrite() treates
> VM_FAULT_RETRY as "lock page and return VM_FAULT_RETRY|VM_FAULT_LOCKED".
> Both callers do the same check -
>                 if (unlikely(!tmp || (tmp &
>                                       (VM_FAULT_ERROR | VM_FAULT_NOPAGE)))) {
> and the return value if that predicate is false.  FWIW, use of VM_FAULT_RETRY
> comes from your patch back in 2011 and AFAICS the same analysis used to
> apply back then, except for the open-coded method calls where we use
> do_page_mkwrite() these days...

Yeah, back then I was not aware of VM_FAULT_RETRY limitations and your
analysis above just shows that its handling from do_page_mkwrite() is
simply broken (or better non-existent). Actually that VM_FAULT_RETRY
return was added by fs freeze handling patch. The freeze handling was
later changed but that change to block_page_mkwrite_return() remained.
I'll send a patch to remove it. Thanks for spotting this.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-03 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-24 21:23 [PATCH] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-26 12:35     ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24       ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24         ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24         ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ceph: switch DIO code to use iov_iter_get_pages_alloc Jeff Layton
2017-01-30 15:40           ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32   ` [PATCH v3 " Jeff Layton
2017-02-02  9:51   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call Al Viro
2017-02-02 10:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 11:16       ` Al Viro
2017-02-02 13:00         ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-03  7:29           ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 18:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 19:08               ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 19:28                 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-13  9:56                   ` Steve Capper
2017-02-13 21:40                     ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03  7:49           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03  8:54             ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 11:09               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 14:48     ` Jan Kara
2017-02-02 18:28       ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 14:47         ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-02-04  3:08     ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 19:26       ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 22:12         ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-04 22:11       ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05  1:51         ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 20:15           ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 21:01             ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 21:19               ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 22:04                 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06  3:05                   ` Al Viro
2017-02-06  9:08                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-06  9:57                       ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 14:18                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-07  7:19                           ` Al Viro
2017-02-07 11:35                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-08  5:54                               ` Al Viro
2017-02-08  9:53                                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-06  8:37                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 20:56           ` Al Viro
2017-02-16 13:10     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170203144756.GC5844@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).