From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Kirill Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] procfs: fdinfo -- Extend information about epoll target files
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:54:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222075438.GB22938@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AD4147.20801@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:44:07AM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 10:16 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:41:12AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>> Thus lets add file position, inode and device number where
> >>> this target lays. This three fields can be used as a primary
> >>> key for sorting, and together with kcmp help CRIU can find
> >>> out an exact file target (from the whole set of processes
> >>> being checkpointed).
> >>
> >> I have no problem with this, but I'm wondering whether kcmp's ordered
> >> comparisons could also be used for this purpose.
> >
> > Yes it can, but it would increas number of kcmp calls signisicantly.
>
> Actually it shouldn't. If you extend the kcmp argument to accept the
> epollfd:epollslot pair, this would be effectively the same as if you
> had all your epoll-ed files injected into your fdtable with "strange"
> fd numbers. We already have two-level rbtree for this in criu, adding
> extended ("strange") fd to it should be OK.
Nope. Pavel, I guess you forget how we handle file tree in criu currently.
We call for kcmp only if we have to -- when primary key for two entries
is the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 16:59 [RFC 1/3] procfs: fdinfo -- Extend information about epoll target files Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-21 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-21 19:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 7:44 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2017-02-22 7:54 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2017-02-22 8:09 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2017-02-22 8:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 8:29 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2017-02-22 8:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222075438.GB22938@uranus \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=kir@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).