From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: allow kmem_zalloc_greedy to fail
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:44:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302164438.GC24806@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170302161606.GQ1404@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I've just realized that Darrick was not on the CC list. Let's add him.
> I believe this patch should go in in the current cycle because
> 5d17a73a2ebe was merged in this merge window and it can be abused...
>
> The other patch [1] is not that urgent.
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170302154541.16155-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Both patches look ok to me. I'll take both patches for rc2.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
(Annoyingly I missed the whole thread yesterday due to vger slowness, in
case anyone was wondering why I didn't reply.)
--D
>
> On Thu 02-03-17 16:45:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> >
> > Even though kmem_zalloc_greedy is documented it might fail the current
> > code doesn't really implement this properly and loops on the smallest
> > allowed size for ever. This is a problem because vzalloc might fail
> > permanently - we might run out of vmalloc space or since 5d17a73a2ebe
> > ("vmalloc: back off when the current task is killed") when the current
> > task is killed. The later one makes the failure scenario much more
> > probable than it used to be because it makes vmalloc() failures
> > permanent for tasks with fatal signals pending.. Fix this by bailing out
> > if the minimum size request failed.
> >
> > This has been noticed by a hung generic/269 xfstest by Xiong Zhou.
> >
> > fsstress: vmalloc: allocation failure, allocated 12288 of 20480 bytes, mode:0x14080c2(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null)
> > fsstress cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0-1
> > CPU: 1 PID: 23460 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.10.0-master-45554b2+ #21
> > Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9/ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 10/05/2016
> > Call Trace:
> > dump_stack+0x63/0x87
> > warn_alloc+0x114/0x1c0
> > ? alloc_pages_current+0x88/0x120
> > __vmalloc_node_range+0x250/0x2a0
> > ? kmem_zalloc_greedy+0x2b/0x40 [xfs]
> > ? free_hot_cold_page+0x21f/0x280
> > vzalloc+0x54/0x60
> > ? kmem_zalloc_greedy+0x2b/0x40 [xfs]
> > kmem_zalloc_greedy+0x2b/0x40 [xfs]
> > xfs_bulkstat+0x11b/0x730 [xfs]
> > ? xfs_bulkstat_one_int+0x340/0x340 [xfs]
> > ? selinux_capable+0x20/0x30
> > ? security_capable+0x48/0x60
> > xfs_ioc_bulkstat+0xe4/0x190 [xfs]
> > xfs_file_ioctl+0x9dd/0xad0 [xfs]
> > ? do_filp_open+0xa5/0x100
> > do_vfs_ioctl+0xa7/0x5e0
> > SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> > do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
> > entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> >
> > fsstress keeps looping inside kmem_zalloc_greedy without any way out
> > because vmalloc keeps failing due to fatal_signal_pending.
> >
> > Reported-by: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
> > Analyzed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/kmem.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/kmem.c b/fs/xfs/kmem.c
> > index 339c696bbc01..ee95f5c6db45 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/kmem.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/kmem.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ kmem_zalloc_greedy(size_t *size, size_t minsize, size_t maxsize)
> > size_t kmsize = maxsize;
> >
> > while (!(ptr = vzalloc(kmsize))) {
> > + if (kmsize == minsize)
> > + break;
> > if ((kmsize >>= 1) <= minsize)
> > kmsize = minsize;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-01 4:46 mm allocation failure and hang when running xfstests generic/269 on xfs Xiong Zhou
2017-03-02 0:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02 5:19 ` Xiong Zhou
2017-03-02 6:41 ` Bob Liu
2017-03-02 6:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-03-02 8:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 9:23 ` Xiong Zhou
2017-03-02 10:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-02 10:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 10:53 ` mm allocation failure and hang when running xfstests generic/269on xfs Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-02 12:24 ` mm allocation failure and hang when running xfstests generic/269 on xfs Brian Foster
2017-03-02 12:49 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 13:00 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 13:07 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-02 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 13:41 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 13:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 14:23 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 14:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 14:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 15:30 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: allow kmem_zalloc_greedy to fail Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: back off from kmem_zalloc_greedy if the task is killed Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02 15:59 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: allow kmem_zalloc_greedy to fail Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02 15:59 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 16:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-03-03 22:54 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-03 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-04 4:48 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-06 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 15:47 ` mm allocation failure and hang when running xfstests generic/269 on xfs Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170302164438.GC24806@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=xzhou@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).