From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:07:54 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove kmem_zalloc_greedy
Message-ID: <20170307000754.GA9959@lst.de>
References: <20170306184109.GC5280@birch.djwong.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170306184109.GC5280@birch.djwong.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

I like killing it, but shouldn't we just try a normal kmem_zalloc?
At least for the fallback it's the right thing, and even for an
order 2 allocation it seems like a useful first try.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>