From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't overwrite node block by SSR
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:39:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170308213955.GC5483@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2be8ba18-21ed-a990-70d1-12be80ed13d2@huawei.com>
On 03/08, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/3/7 5:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch fixes that SSR can overwrite previous warm node block consisting of
> > a node chain since the last checkpoint.
>
> Good catch!
>
> Need to consider the impact to other accesser, e.g. is_checkpointed_data,
> add_discard_addrs?
I've checked them. is_checkpointed_data() has nothing to do with this warm node
and this prevents add_discard_addrs to issue discard command.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Fixes: 5b6c6be2d878 ("f2fs: use SSR for warm node as well")
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 2ae36d04d03e..684b869e1861 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1177,6 +1177,12 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> > if (f2fs_discard_en(sbi) &&
> > !f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->discard_map))
> > sbi->discard_blks--;
> > +
> > + /* don't overwrite by SSR to keep node chain */
> > + if (se->type == CURSEG_WARM_NODE) {
> > + if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> > + se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
> > + }
> > } else {
> > if (!f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map)) {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 21:51 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: don't need to invalidate wrong node page Jaegeuk Kim
2017-03-06 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't overwrite node block by SSR Jaegeuk Kim
2017-03-08 12:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-03-08 21:39 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-03-09 12:07 ` Chao Yu
2017-03-08 12:17 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: don't need to invalidate wrong node page Chao Yu
2017-03-08 21:35 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-03-09 11:36 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170308213955.GC5483@jaegeuk.local \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).