From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:36746 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755313AbdDESCH (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:02:07 -0400 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , "# v4 . 10+" Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "f2fs: put allocate_segment after refresh_sit_entry" Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:02:01 -0700 Message-Id: <20170405180201.4021-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20170405180201.4021-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> References: <20170405180201.4021-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This reverts commit 3436c4bdb30de421d46f58c9174669fbcfd40ce0. This makes a leak to register dirty segments. I reproduced the issue by modified postmark which injects a lot of file create/delete/update and finally triggers huge number of SSR allocations. Cc: # v4.10+ [Jaegeuk Kim: Change missing incorrect comment] Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index eedbed62947f..ed81fa5d64bf 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -1893,15 +1893,14 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page, stat_inc_block_count(sbi, curseg); + if (!__has_curseg_space(sbi, type)) + sit_i->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, false); /* - * SIT information should be updated before segment allocation, - * since SSR needs latest valid block information. + * SIT information should be updated after segment allocation, + * since we need to keep dirty segments precisely under SSR. */ refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr); - if (!__has_curseg_space(sbi, type)) - sit_i->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, false); - mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock); if (page && IS_NODESEG(type)) -- 2.11.0