From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49827 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1755173AbdEDN7Q (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 4 May 2017 09:59:16 -0400
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 15:59:13 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] xfs: re-define uuid_t as common struct uuid_v1
Message-ID: <20170504135913.GA17831@lst.de>
References: <1493904383-2187-1-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> <1493904383-2187-3-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> <20170504133417.GD17222@lst.de> <CAOQ4uxjxyEGZOAm2rCR+PcdFqfmJxgBBO7_SexPkPRy+0eePOA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjxyEGZOAm2rCR+PcdFqfmJxgBBO7_SexPkPRy+0eePOA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:57:51PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> I did consider defining uuid_t as uuid_be.
> most of the patch set would have remained the same and
> xfs_uuid_getnodeuniq() would use struct uuid_v1 explicitly
> instead of implicitly.

At least don't add new users of uuid_v1.  Moving that stuff into
uuid.[ch] was a major mistake, and I wish review would have caught
it back then.