From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
<xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
<avagin@openvz.org>, <jbaron@akamai.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [patch v4 resend 2/2] kcmp: Add KCMP_EPOLL_TFD mode to compare epoll target files
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 18:45:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170513014508.GA21900@outlook.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512225340.GD1881@uranus.lan>
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 01:53:40AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:41:30AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > [resending as plaintext]
> >
> > I realize that the existing kcmp code has the same issue, but:
> >
> > Why are you not taking a reference to filp or filp_tgt? This can end up
> > performing a comparison between a pointer to a freed struct file and a
> > pointer to a struct file that was allocated afterwards, right? So it can
> > return a false "is equal" result when the two files aren't actually the same
> > if one of the target tasks is running? This looks like it unnecessarily
> > exposes information about whether an allocation reuses the memory of
> > a previously freed allocation.
>
> It work with unlocked data on purpose for speed sake. Moreover even
> if we grap a reference it is valid _only_ during comparision operation,
> next we drop ref and it can be easily freed by os. Thus it's up to
> a caller to keep references to files/task and other resources used.
Looks like we can take rcu_read_lock() to guarantee that these objects
will not be freed, and rcu_read_lock() should not affect perfomance too much.
>
> Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-13 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-24 15:39 [patch v4 resend 2/2] kcmp: Add KCMP_EPOLL_TFD mode to compare epoll target files Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-05-12 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2017-05-12 22:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-05-12 22:41 ` Jann Horn
2017-05-12 22:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-05-13 1:45 ` Andrei Vagin [this message]
2017-05-13 6:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-05-13 7:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-09-17 16:01 ` [v4,resend,2/2] " Eugene Syromiatnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170513014508.GA21900@outlook.office365.com \
--to=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).