From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47845 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750885AbdEPLul (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 16 May 2017 07:50:41 -0400
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:50:29 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/locks: don't mess with the address limit in
        compat_fcntl64
Message-ID: <20170516115029.GA17669@lst.de>
References: <20170515203306.26336-1-hch@lst.de> <20170515203306.26336-3-hch@lst.de> <1494931570.2852.3.camel@poochiereds.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1494931570.2852.3.camel@poochiereds.net>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 06:46:10AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Erm...build break above though -- flock is a pointer there, so those
> should be "flock->...". I'll just squash that fix into the patch unless
> you need to send a respin for other reasons.

Thanks.  I did a last minute fixup to factor this into a helper and messed
up..