From: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Add freeze support
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:37:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530023740.GA15808@sebu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e61baf3-a78e-d17f-ebe2-cd56d6c52259@nod.at>
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hyunchul,
>
> Am 29.05.2017 um 04:24 schrieb Hyunchul Lee:
> >>> This is just broken. First ubifs should still properly propagate
> >>> the errors, and second freezing/unfreezing read only file systems is
> >>> perfectly valid,
> >>
> >> it is right.
> >
> > if updating TNC is failed, ubifs might become inconsistant and be switched to
> > read-only mode. for example, when ubifs_jnl_update is called to create a file,
> > if inserting a znode for new inode is failed, TNC has only a znode for
> > new dentry. and this can be only recoverd by replay.
> >
> > is it required to fix this?
>
> UBIFS is designed to be power-cut tolerant.
> So, UBIFS must not corrupt in any case.
>
> Which failure are you facing?
>
> I have the feeling that you try to paper over some other issue. :-)
The failure hasn't happened. I wondered the following situation
should be handled.
ubifs_create
ubifs_jnl_update
write_head
ubifs_tnc_add_nm /* (1) add dentry to TNC */
ubifs_tnc_add /* (2) add new inode to TNC */
ubifs_tnc_add /* (3) add parent inode to TNC */
If ubifs_tnc_add(2) fails, TNC would have the index of a dentry
which points to an invalid inode. So, though ubifs_readdir
emits the dentry, this inode cannot be accessed. Becasue
there isn't the index of the inode.
I know this situation is hardly probable. But UBIFS would
be read-only and inconsitant in this situation, until replay
is completed.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
Thanks,
Hyunchul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 23:30 [PATCH] ubifs: Add freeze support Hyunchul Lee
2017-05-26 9:52 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-27 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-29 1:18 ` Hyunchul Lee
2017-05-29 4:40 ` Hyunchul Lee
2017-05-29 5:40 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-05-29 9:00 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-29 10:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-05-29 10:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-29 11:44 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-05-27 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-29 0:43 ` Hyunchul Lee
2017-05-29 2:24 ` Hyunchul Lee
2017-05-29 8:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-30 2:37 ` Hyunchul Lee [this message]
2017-05-30 7:51 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530023740.GA15808@sebu \
--to=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).