From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:40:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201706122240.14996@pali> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]
Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have
block size different from disk sector size and also different from 2048.
But should not detection on 4K native disks (4096/4096) try to also use
block size of 512 bytes? Because current loop is from logical sector
size to 4096.
Most of current hard drivers are 512/4096 (logical/physical), but there
are available USB based SATA controllers which via USB mass storage mode
reports logical block size value from physical block size of SATA disk.
So via such SATA controller computer see 4096/4096 disk and is unable to
detect UDF file system if was formatted with 512 block size.
Anyway, macro UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE is not used in udf source code
anymore, so it can be deleted. I think its name was incorrect as default
block size for UDF should be logical block size of disk, not hardcoded
value 2048 which is logical block size for optical media.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-12 20:40 Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-06-13 12:59 ` udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount Jan Kara
2017-06-14 19:36 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-15 8:34 ` Jan Kara
2017-06-15 13:49 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201706122240.14996@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=fabf@skynet.be \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).