From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted file
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:03:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614070357.GB605@zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170614065210.GA10411@infradead.org>
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:52:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 04:47:53PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > Currently, filesystems allow truncate(2) on an encrypted file without
> > the encryption key. However, it's impossible to correctly handle the
> > case where the size being truncated to is not a multiple of the
> > filesystem block size, because that would require decrypting the final
> > block, zeroing the part beyond i_size, then encrypting the block.
> >
> > As other modifications to encrypted file contents are prohibited without
> > the key, just prohibit truncate(2) as well, making it fail with ENOKEY.
>
> What about hole punches? What about fallocate which just adds zeroes
> but still changes the content. What about insert or collapse range?
None of those are allowed because fallocate() requires a file descriptor, and
open() fails with ENOKEY if the encryption key is not available. truncate() is
different because it takes a path, not a file descriptor.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-14 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-13 23:47 [PATCH 0/3] fscrypt: forbid truncate(2) without key Eric Biggers
2017-06-13 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted file Eric Biggers
2017-06-14 0:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-06-14 3:12 ` Eric Biggers
2017-06-14 4:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-06-14 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-14 7:03 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2017-06-14 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-23 23:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-13 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: " Eric Biggers
2017-06-14 12:44 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-06-13 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] ubifs: " Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170614070357.GB605@zzz \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).