From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce bmap_walk()
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:34:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620073456.GA8453@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619181956.GH10672@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 07:19:57PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Speaking of iomap, what's supposed to happen when doing a write into what
> used to be a hole? Suppose we have a file with a megabyte hole in it
> and there's some process mmapping that range. Another process does
> write over the entire range. We call ->iomap_begin() and allocate
> disk blocks. Then we start copying data into those. In the meanwhile,
> the first process attempts to fetch from address in the middle of that
> hole. What should happen?
Right now the buffered iomap code expects delayed allocations.
So ->iomap_begin will only reserve block in memory, and not even
mark the blocks as allocated in the page / buffer_head. The fact
that the block is allocated is only propagated into the page buffer_head
on a page by page basis in the actor.
> Should the blocks we'd allocated in ->iomap_begin() be immediately linked
> into the whatever indirect locks/btree/whatnot we are using? That would
> require zeroing all of them first - otherwise that readpage will read
> uninitialized block. Another variant would be to delay linking them
> in until ->iomap_end(), but... Suppose we get the page evicted by
> memory pressure after the writer is finished with it. If ->readpage()
> comes before ->iomap_end(), we'll need to somehow figure out that it's
> not a hole anymore, or we'll end up with an uptodate page full of zeroes
> observed by reads after successful write().
Delayed blocks are ignored by the read code, so it will read 'through'
them.
> The comment you've got in linux/iomap.h would seem to suggest the second
> interpretation, but neither it nor anything in Documentation discusses the
> relations with readpage/writepage...
I'll see if I can come up with some better documentation.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-17 1:15 [RFC PATCH 0/2] daxfile: enable byte-addressable updates to pmem Dan Williams
2017-06-17 1:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce bmap_walk() Dan Williams
2017-06-17 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-17 12:29 ` Dan Williams
2017-06-18 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-19 16:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-19 18:19 ` Al Viro
2017-06-20 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-06-17 1:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm, fs: daxfile, an interface for byte-addressable updates to pmem Dan Williams
2017-06-17 16:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-17 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2017-06-17 23:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-18 3:15 ` Dan Williams
2017-06-18 5:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-19 13:21 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-19 15:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-20 0:46 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-20 5:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-20 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-20 16:17 ` Dan Williams
2017-06-20 16:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-20 23:53 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-21 1:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-21 2:19 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-20 10:11 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-20 16:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-21 1:40 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-21 5:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-22 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-22 4:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-23 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-23 3:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-18 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-19 1:51 ` Dan Williams
2017-06-20 5:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-20 15:42 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-06-22 7:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-21 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2017-06-22 7:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170620073456.GA8453@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).