From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] bio: add bvec_iter rewind API
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:31:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629183116.28685-8-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629183116.28685-1-hch@lst.de>
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Some ->bi_end_io handlers (for example: pi_verify or decrypt handlers)
need to know original data vector, but after bio traverse io-stack it may
be advanced, splited and relocated many times so it is hard to guess
original iterator. Let's add 'bi_done' conter which accounts number
of bytes iterator was advanced during it's evolution. Later end_io handler
may easily restore original iterator by rewinding iterator to
iter->bi_done.
Note: this change makes sizeof (struct bvec_iter) multiple to 8
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
[hch: switched to true/false return]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
include/linux/bio.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/bvec.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index f27b22330ae7..7b989233e8d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -165,14 +165,29 @@ static inline void bio_advance_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *iter,
{
iter->bi_sector += bytes >> 9;
- if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio))
+ if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio)) {
iter->bi_size -= bytes;
- else {
+ iter->bi_done += bytes;
+ } else {
bvec_iter_advance(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
/* TODO: It is reasonable to complete bio with error here. */
}
}
+static inline bool bio_rewind_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *iter,
+ unsigned int bytes)
+{
+ iter->bi_sector -= bytes >> 9;
+
+ if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio)) {
+ iter->bi_size += bytes;
+ iter->bi_done -= bytes;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return bvec_iter_rewind(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
+}
+
#define __bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter, start) \
for (iter = (start); \
(iter).bi_size && \
diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
index de317b4c13c1..ec8a4d7af6bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct bvec_iter {
unsigned int bi_idx; /* current index into bvl_vec */
+ unsigned int bi_done; /* number of bytes completed */
+
unsigned int bi_bvec_done; /* number of bytes completed in
current bvec */
};
@@ -83,6 +85,7 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
bytes -= len;
iter->bi_size -= len;
iter->bi_bvec_done += len;
+ iter->bi_done += len;
if (iter->bi_bvec_done == __bvec_iter_bvec(bv, *iter)->bv_len) {
iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
@@ -92,6 +95,30 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
return true;
}
+static inline bool bvec_iter_rewind(const struct bio_vec *bv,
+ struct bvec_iter *iter,
+ unsigned int bytes)
+{
+ while (bytes) {
+ unsigned len = min(bytes, iter->bi_bvec_done);
+
+ if (iter->bi_bvec_done == 0) {
+ if (WARN_ONCE(iter->bi_idx == 0,
+ "Attempted to rewind iter beyond "
+ "bvec's boundaries\n")) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ iter->bi_idx--;
+ iter->bi_bvec_done = __bvec_iter_bvec(bv, *iter)->bv_len;
+ continue;
+ }
+ bytes -= len;
+ iter->bi_size += len;
+ iter->bi_bvec_done -= len;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
#define for_each_bvec(bvl, bio_vec, iter, start) \
for (iter = (start); \
(iter).bi_size && \
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-29 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-29 18:31 block: T10/DIF Fixes and cleanups v5 Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] bio-integrity: bio_trim should truncate integrity vector accordingly Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] bio-integrity: bio_integrity_advance must update integrity seed Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] bio-integrity: fix interface for bio_integrity_trim Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] bio-integrity: fold bio_integrity_enabled to bio_integrity_prep Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] t10-pi: Move opencoded contants to common header Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] block: guard bvec iteration logic Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] bio-integrity: Restore original iterator on verify stage Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] bio-integrity: stop abusing bi_end_io Christoph Hellwig
2017-07-03 23:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170629183116.28685-8-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).