From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] bio-integrity: Restore original iterator on verify stage
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:31:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629183116.28685-9-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629183116.28685-1-hch@lst.de>
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Currently ->verify_fn not woks at all because at the moment it is called
bio->bi_iter.bi_size == 0, so we do not iterate integrity bvecs at all.
In order to perform verification we need to know original data vector,
with new bvec rewind API this is trivial.
testcase: https://github.com/dmonakhov/xfstests/commit/3c6509eaa83b9c17cd0bc95d73fcdd76e1c54a85
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
[hch: adopted for new status values]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
block/bio-integrity.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
index 44c4c52681c2..8df4eb103ba9 100644
--- a/block/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
@@ -184,10 +184,11 @@ static inline unsigned int bio_integrity_bytes(struct blk_integrity *bi,
/**
* bio_integrity_process - Process integrity metadata for a bio
* @bio: bio to generate/verify integrity metadata for
+ * @proc_iter: iterator to process
* @proc_fn: Pointer to the relevant processing function
*/
static blk_status_t bio_integrity_process(struct bio *bio,
- integrity_processing_fn *proc_fn)
+ struct bvec_iter *proc_iter, integrity_processing_fn *proc_fn)
{
struct blk_integrity *bi = bdev_get_integrity(bio->bi_bdev);
struct blk_integrity_iter iter;
@@ -200,10 +201,10 @@ static blk_status_t bio_integrity_process(struct bio *bio,
iter.disk_name = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name;
iter.interval = 1 << bi->interval_exp;
- iter.seed = bip_get_seed(bip);
+ iter.seed = proc_iter->bi_sector;
iter.prot_buf = prot_buf;
- bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, bviter) {
+ __bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, bviter, *proc_iter) {
void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(bv.bv_page);
iter.data_buf = kaddr + bv.bv_offset;
@@ -332,8 +333,10 @@ bool bio_integrity_prep(struct bio *bio)
}
/* Auto-generate integrity metadata if this is a write */
- if (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE)
- bio_integrity_process(bio, bi->profile->generate_fn);
+ if (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) {
+ bio_integrity_process(bio, &bio->bi_iter,
+ bi->profile->generate_fn);
+ }
return true;
err_end_io:
@@ -358,8 +361,19 @@ static void bio_integrity_verify_fn(struct work_struct *work)
container_of(work, struct bio_integrity_payload, bip_work);
struct bio *bio = bip->bip_bio;
struct blk_integrity *bi = bdev_get_integrity(bio->bi_bdev);
+ struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
- bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, bi->profile->verify_fn);
+ /*
+ * At the moment verify is called bio's iterator was advanced
+ * during split and completion, we need to rewind iterator to
+ * it's original position.
+ */
+ if (bio_rewind_iter(bio, &iter, iter.bi_done)) {
+ bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, &iter,
+ bi->profile->verify_fn);
+ } else {
+ bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
+ }
/* Restore original bio completion handler */
bio->bi_end_io = bip->bip_end_io;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-29 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-29 18:31 block: T10/DIF Fixes and cleanups v5 Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] bio-integrity: bio_trim should truncate integrity vector accordingly Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] bio-integrity: bio_integrity_advance must update integrity seed Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] bio-integrity: fix interface for bio_integrity_trim Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] bio-integrity: fold bio_integrity_enabled to bio_integrity_prep Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] t10-pi: Move opencoded contants to common header Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] block: guard bvec iteration logic Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] bio: add bvec_iter rewind API Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-29 18:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-06-29 18:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] bio-integrity: stop abusing bi_end_io Christoph Hellwig
2017-07-03 23:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170629183116.28685-9-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).