From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Fix page cache inconsistency when mixing buffered and AIO DIO
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:32:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718093215.f7ze3h3ytmbb7slq@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718090626.GA2583@quack2.suse.cz>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:06:26AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 18-07-17 09:39:35, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:39:09AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > > Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > About the error case, is it not possible that some data has already been
> > > > writtent to the disk despite the error ?
> > >
> > > Yes, it's possible. However, that data is in an inconsistent state, so
> > > it shouldn't be read, anyway.
> >
> > I think it can be read if we wrote into already allocated space.
> >
> > >
> > > Now, in the non-async path, we do the invalidation unconditionally, so I
> > > could go either way on this. I don't think it's going to matter for
> > > performance or data integrity.
> >
> > That's part of the reason why I did it unconditionaly as well, however
> > Jan is right that ret would be negative. The way to fix it would differ
> > depending on whether I am right about reading partially written data
> > from AIO that failed. We still want to invalidate in that case.
>
> Frankly, I don't think it really matters so I'd go for not invalidating
> anything on error just out of philosophy: "There's something weird going
> on, bail out as quickly as you can."
>
> Honza
Fair enough, thanks!
-Lukas
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-13 15:17 [PATCH] fs: Fix page cache inconsistency when mixing buffered and AIO DIO Lukas Czerner
2017-07-14 10:41 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-14 13:40 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-07-14 15:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Lukas Czerner
2017-07-17 15:12 ` Jan Kara
2017-07-17 15:28 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-07-17 15:39 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-07-17 16:17 ` Jan Kara
2017-07-17 19:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-07-18 7:39 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-07-18 9:06 ` Jan Kara
2017-07-18 9:32 ` Lukas Czerner [this message]
2017-07-18 12:19 ` [PATCH v3] " Lukas Czerner
2017-07-18 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-07-18 14:17 ` Jan Kara
2017-07-19 8:42 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-07-19 8:48 ` [PATCH v4] " Lukas Czerner
2017-07-19 9:26 ` Jan Kara
2017-07-19 11:01 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-07-19 11:28 ` [PATCH v5] " Lukas Czerner
2017-07-19 11:37 ` Jan Kara
2017-07-19 12:17 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-08-03 18:10 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-08-04 10:09 ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-07 15:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-08-08 8:41 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-10 12:59 ` [PATCH v6] " Lukas Czerner
2017-08-10 13:56 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-10 14:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-08-11 9:03 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-14 9:43 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-15 12:47 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-15 13:28 ` [PATCH v7] " Lukas Czerner
2017-08-16 13:15 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-16 16:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-21 13:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-09-21 13:44 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-09-21 14:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-10 14:34 ` David Sterba
2017-10-11 9:21 ` Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170718093215.f7ze3h3ytmbb7slq@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox