From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dax: explain how read(2)/write(2) addresses are validated
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:36:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816173615.10098-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJqoegDg07vR0iRRV1U_qOpZx5eLbywEwD_sm-D7sQmdA@mail.gmail.com>
Add a comment explaining how the user addresses provided to read(2) and
write(2) are validated in the DAX I/O path. We call dax_copy_from_iter()
or copy_to_iter() on these without calling access_ok() first in the DAX
code, and there was a concern that the user might be able to read/write to
arbitrary kernel addresses with this path.
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
---
Adding a comment instead of adding redundant access_ok() calls in the DAX
code. If this is the wrong path to take, please let me know.
fs/dax.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 8c67517..2d50f32 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -1060,6 +1060,11 @@ dax_iomap_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
if (map_len > end - pos)
map_len = end - pos;
+ /*
+ * The userspace address for the memory copy has already been
+ * validated via access_ok() in either vfs_read() or
+ * vfs_write(), depending on which operation we are doing.
+ */
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
map_len = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
map_len, iter);
--
2.9.5
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAGXu5jJqoegDg07vR0iRRV1U_qOpZx5eLbywEwD_sm-D7sQmdA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-08-16 17:36 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2017-08-17 8:53 ` [PATCH] dax: explain how read(2)/write(2) addresses are validated Jan Kara
2017-08-17 15:20 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170816173615.10098-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).