From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:41116 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751190AbdH1UJ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:09:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:09:24 -0600 From: Ross Zwisler To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ross Zwisler , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: consolidate the various page fault handlers Message-ID: <20170828200924.GB17577@linux.intel.com> References: <20170824152207.30729-1-hch@lst.de> <20170824152207.30729-3-hch@lst.de> <20170824212942.GB20489@linux.intel.com> <20170825071538.GB9191@lst.de> <20170828175014.GA17577@linux.intel.com> <20170828175257.GA29190@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170828175257.GA29190@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 07:52:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:50:14AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > Yep - I'm doing that in include/trace/events/fs_dax.h if you want to just copy > > & paste. > > Oh, nice. But maybe we need the trace point in the core MM instead > of in XFS and the DAX code? :) Yea, there aren't any tracepoints at all in mm/memory.c. I'm not sure if that's because we just haven't gotten around to putting them in, or if for some reason it was intentional to not trace that bit of code?