From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:27760 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750886AbdIRS7u (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:59:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:59:37 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ext4: Switch to iomap for SEEK_HOLE / SEEK_DATA Message-ID: <20170918185937.GO6540@magnolia> References: <20170914140619.29826-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20170914211519.aieumj734uazwlmj@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:52:32PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > >> From: Christoph Hellwig > >> > >> Here we go, after another round of xfstests. > >> > >> The next question, since it touches vfs infrastructure, is which tree > >> this patch queue should be merged through. Al? > > > > Discussions with Darrick before he went on vacation/honeymoon was that > > up until now changes to fs/iomap.c had been going through XFS, but > > since these changes didn't affect XFS, and the rest of the patch > > series touches ext4 and ext4 functionality, that he was OK with > > running this patch series through the ext4 tree. > > That sure works for me. Me too. (Back from vacation, weeding his way through 2400 emails...) --D > > Andreas > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html