From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork use after free
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:30:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920183041.GA29542@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170920180413.26713-1-aarcange@redhat.com>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:04:13PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> When reading the event from the uffd, we put it on a temporary
> fork_event list to detect if we can still access it after releasing
> and retaking the event_wqh.lock.
>
> If fork aborts and removes the event from the fork_event all is fine
> as long as we're still in the userfault read context and fork_event
> head is still alive.
>
> We've to put the event allocated in the fork kernel stack, back from
> fork_event list-head to the event_wqh head, before returning from
> userfaultfd_ctx_read, because the fork_event head lifetime is limited
> to the userfaultfd_ctx_read stack lifetime.
>
> Forgetting to move the event back to its event_wqh place then results
> in __remove_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &ewq->wq); in
> userfaultfd_event_wait_completion to remove it from a head that has
> been already freed from the reader stack.
>
> This could only happen if resolve_userfault_fork failed (for example
> if there are no file descriptors available to allocate the fork
> uffd). If it succeeded it was put back correctly.
>
> Furthermore, after find_userfault_evt receives a fork event, the
> forked userfault context in fork_nctx and
> uwq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1 can be released by the fork thread as
> soon as the event_wqh.lock is released. Taking a reference on the
> fork_nctx before dropping the lock prevents an use after free in
> resolve_userfault_fork().
>
> If the fork side aborted and it already released everything, we still
> try to succeed resolve_userfault_fork(), if possible.
>
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 13:18 userfaultfd use-after-free Mark Rutland
2017-09-20 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork use after free Andrea Arcangeli
2017-09-20 18:30 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-09-21 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170920183041.GA29542@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).