From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, clm@fb.com, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] fs-writeback: move nr_pages == 0 logic to one location
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:17:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170922131701.GC22455@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505921582-26709-7-git-send-email-axboe@kernel.dk>
On Wed 20-09-17 09:33:01, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Now that we have no external callers of wb_start_writeback(), we
> can shuffle the passing in of 'nr_pages'. Everybody passes in 0
> at this point, so just kill the argument and move the dirty
> count retrieval to that function.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Tested-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index ecbd26d1121d..3916ea2484ae 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -933,8 +933,19 @@ static void bdi_split_work_to_wbs(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
>
> -static void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
> - bool range_cyclic, enum wb_reason reason)
> +/*
> + * Add in the number of potentially dirty inodes, because each inode
> + * write can dirty pagecache in the underlying blockdev.
> + */
> +static unsigned long get_nr_dirty_pages(void)
> +{
> + return global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
> + global_node_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
> + get_nr_dirty_inodes();
> +}
> +
> +static void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, bool range_cyclic,
> + enum wb_reason reason)
> {
> struct wb_writeback_work *work;
>
> @@ -954,7 +965,7 @@ static void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
> }
>
> work->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE;
> - work->nr_pages = nr_pages;
> + work->nr_pages = wb_split_bdi_pages(wb, get_nr_dirty_pages());
> work->range_cyclic = range_cyclic;
> work->reason = reason;
> work->auto_free = 1;
> @@ -1814,17 +1825,6 @@ static struct wb_writeback_work *get_next_work_item(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> return work;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Add in the number of potentially dirty inodes, because each inode
> - * write can dirty pagecache in the underlying blockdev.
> - */
> -static unsigned long get_nr_dirty_pages(void)
> -{
> - return global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
> - global_node_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
> - get_nr_dirty_inodes();
> -}
> -
> static long wb_check_background_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> {
> if (wb_over_bg_thresh(wb)) {
> @@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> * write back the whole world.
> */
> static void __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> - long nr_pages, enum wb_reason reason)
> + enum wb_reason reason)
> {
> struct bdi_writeback *wb;
>
> @@ -1959,17 +1959,14 @@ static void __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> return;
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(wb, &bdi->wb_list, bdi_node)
> - wb_start_writeback(wb, wb_split_bdi_pages(wb, nr_pages),
> - false, reason);
> + wb_start_writeback(wb, false, reason);
> }
>
> void wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> enum wb_reason reason)
> {
> - long nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
> -
> rcu_read_lock();
> - __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, nr_pages, reason);
> + __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, reason);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> @@ -1979,7 +1976,6 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> void wakeup_flusher_threads(enum wb_reason reason)
> {
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
> - long nr_pages;
>
> /*
> * If we are expecting writeback progress we must submit plugged IO.
> @@ -1987,11 +1983,9 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(enum wb_reason reason)
> if (blk_needs_flush_plug(current))
> blk_schedule_flush_plug(current);
>
> - nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
> -
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
> - __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, nr_pages, reason);
> + __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, reason);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-22 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-20 15:32 [PATCH 0/7 v2] More graceful flusher thread memory reclaim wakeup Jens Axboe
2017-09-20 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs: kill 'nr_pages' argument from wakeup_flusher_threads() Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-22 13:12 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-20 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs-writeback: provide a wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi() Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 15:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] page-writeback: pass in '0' for nr_pages writeback in laptop mode Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-25 14:57 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-22 13:14 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs-writeback: make wb_start_writeback() static Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 15:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs-writeback: move nr_pages == 0 logic to one location Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-22 13:17 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-09-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] fs-writeback: only allow one inflight and pending full flush Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 15:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 16:00 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-21 17:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-25 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-25 14:48 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-28 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-29 23:20 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-02 14:53 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170922131701.GC22455@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).