From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] fs/dcache: might_sleep is called under a spinlock
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 04:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003031920.GI21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a64563c5-9f87-5150-fb2f-4e7220703c2d@163.com>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:38:25AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> According to fs/dcache.c, might_sleep is called under a spinlock,
> and the function call path is:
> d_prune_aliases (acquire the spinlock)
> dput
> might_sleep
>
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool and my code review.
> A possible fix is to remove might_sleep in dput.
... or to fix your static analysis tool. First of all, that call
of dput() really *can* block and if we had inode->i_lock or dentry->d_lock
still held at that point we'd have a real bug. However, __dentry_kill()
there is called with dentry->d_inode == inode and inode->i_lock held,
so dentry->d_inode is stable until inode->i_lock is dropped. Said
__dentry_kill() contains
if (dentry->d_inode)
dentry_unlink_inode(dentry);
with inode->i_lock held until that point. dentry_unlink_inode() starts
with
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
bool hashed = !d_unhashed(dentry);
if (hashed)
raw_write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq);
__d_clear_type_and_inode(dentry);
hlist_del_init(&dentry->d_u.d_alias);
if (hashed)
raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
so
1) inode in there is guaranteed to be equal to the argument of
d_prune_aliases() and
2) both dentry->d_lock and inode->i_lock are dropped before
dentry_unlink_inode() returns. inode->i_lock is not regained in the
rest of __dentry_kill(); dentry->d_lock is regained and dropped before
__dentry_kill() returns. IOW, we are fine - dput() in d_prune_aliases()
is called without any spinlocks held.
That, BTW, is the reason for
goto restart;
in there, instead of just continuing the loop - if we get to that point,
the list of aliases might have changed.
Removing might_sleep() in dput() would've been wrong - it really might
sleep when called from that point. Here's how: we used to have two
links to the same file - foo/bar and baz/barf. baz/barf used to be
opened, then rm -rf baz happened and later we'd called d_prune_aliases()
on the inode of foo/bar. And as the loop had been executed on one CPU,
on another the opened file got closed, dropping the last reference to
dentry that used to be baz/barf. Note that its parent (the thing that
used to be dentry of baz) is unhashed and the only contributor to its
refcount is our dentry, so dput(parent) *does* drop the last remaining
reference, triggering the final iput() on inode of baz, along with
freeing on-disk inode, doing disk IO, etc.
Again, it's not that we can't block in that dput() - it's that __dentry_kill()
drops all spinlocks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 2:38 [BUG] fs/dcache: might_sleep is called under a spinlock Jia-Ju Bai
2017-10-03 3:19 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-10-03 8:46 ` Jia-Ju Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171003031920.GI21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=baijiaju1990@163.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).