From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: fix mounting a filesystem with i_version
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 01:58:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171008085840.GA6825@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507436901.5841.4.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 12:28:21AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> The mount i_version flag is not enabled in the new sb_flags. This patch
> adds the missing SB_I_VERSION flag.
>
> Fixes: e462ec5 "VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal
> superblock flags"
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/namespace.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index 3b601f115b6c..d18deb4c410b 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -2825,7 +2825,8 @@ long do_mount(const char *dev_name, const char __user *dir_name,
> SB_MANDLOCK |
> SB_DIRSYNC |
> SB_SILENT |
> - SB_POSIXACL);
> + SB_POSIXACL |
> + SB_I_VERSION);
The problem is that the whole masking there is a piece of crap.
It assumes that MS_* and SB_* flags have the same numeric values,
which is bound to create a major problem rather sooner than later.
What we need is a separate __bitwise type for SB_*, translated them
here and treat them as a separate namespaces.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-08 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-08 4:28 [PATCH] vfs: fix mounting a filesystem with i_version Mimi Zohar
2017-10-08 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-10-08 12:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-08 22:24 ` James Morris
2017-10-11 12:28 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171008085840.GA6825@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).