From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kernel-team@lge.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Add CONFIG_LOCKDEP_AGGRESSIVE
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:57:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211035712.okj5azpzo32juvs4@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211035017.32678-1-tytso@mit.edu>
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:50:17PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS can result
> in a large number of false positives because lockdep doesn't
> understand how to deal with multiple stacked loop or MD devices.
>
> Until someone can figure out how to automatically add annotations to
> all file system and storage devices --- hopefully without forcing
> developers to insert a large number of calls to undocumented lockdep
> macros into the the loop device, every single file system, and every
> single device-mapper backend --- let's add an option to allow these
> lockdep features to be disabled. Otherwise, many file system
> developers will disable LOCKDEP entirely since it results in far too
> many false positives when trying to use xfstests.
Note --- this is going to be in the ext4 git tree because otherwise
using Lockdep would greatly interfere with ext4 development --- and
I'd prefer not to completely give up on Lockdep as a lost cause. As
such, it will appear in linux-next.
I'll drop it from the ext4 git branch before I send a pull request to
Linus, unless I get an OK for me to merge this patch to mainline via
the ext4 git tree.
Cheers,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-11 3:50 [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Add CONFIG_LOCKDEP_AGGRESSIVE Theodore Ts'o
2017-12-11 3:57 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2017-12-11 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-12 1:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-12-12 5:20 ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-12 13:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-12-12 15:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-13 5:33 ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-12 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-13 5:38 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211035712.okj5azpzo32juvs4@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).