linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kernel-team@lge.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Add CONFIG_LOCKDEP_AGGRESSIVE
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:57:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211035712.okj5azpzo32juvs4@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211035017.32678-1-tytso@mit.edu>

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:50:17PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS can result
> in a large number of false positives because lockdep doesn't
> understand how to deal with multiple stacked loop or MD devices.
> 
> Until someone can figure out how to automatically add annotations to
> all file system and storage devices --- hopefully without forcing
> developers to insert a large number of calls to undocumented lockdep
> macros into the the loop device, every single file system, and every
> single device-mapper backend --- let's add an option to allow these
> lockdep features to be disabled.  Otherwise, many file system
> developers will disable LOCKDEP entirely since it results in far too
> many false positives when trying to use xfstests.

Note --- this is going to be in the ext4 git tree because otherwise
using Lockdep would greatly interfere with ext4 development --- and
I'd prefer not to completely give up on Lockdep as a lost cause.  As
such, it will appear in linux-next.

I'll drop it from the ext4 git branch before I send a pull request to
Linus, unless I get an OK for me to merge this patch to mainline via
the ext4 git tree.

Cheers,

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-11  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-11  3:50 [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Add CONFIG_LOCKDEP_AGGRESSIVE Theodore Ts'o
2017-12-11  3:57 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2017-12-11 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-12  1:56   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-12-12  5:20   ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-12 13:03     ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-12-12 15:39       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-13  5:33       ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-12 17:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-13  5:38       ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171211035712.okj5azpzo32juvs4@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).