From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:55394 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932293AbeAATpX (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2018 14:45:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 12:45:22 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Adam Borowski Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH acks] fs/*/Kconfig: drop links to 404-compliant http://acl.bestbits.at Message-ID: <20180101124522.150149ba@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20171220155024.ayldflt2pgdd4pf2@angband.pl> References: <20171213053825.10903-1-kilobyte@angband.pl> <20171220135852.7662-1-kilobyte@angband.pl> <20171220071422.5177d2cf@lwn.net> <20171220155024.ayldflt2pgdd4pf2@angband.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:50:24 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > > So how would you like this to go upstream? I can certainly take it > > through docs, but it seems like vfs might be the first choice...? > > Good question. I submitted it in one piece, to reduce spam (plenty of > mostly two-line changes to elebenty filesystems' prose), and no one pays me > per-commit, but splitting Documentation/ from fs/*/Kbuild might be > reasonable. > > Al: would you prefer to take it as a single commit, as Doc + fs, or chopped > into tiny bits? I've gone ahead and applied this. jon