From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47844 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964872AbeAJP4h (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:56:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:56:36 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Al Viro , Avi Kivity , linux-aio@kvack.org, Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , y2038 Mailman List Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/31] aio: implement io_pgetevents Message-ID: <20180110155635.GA18934@lst.de> References: <20180104080043.14506-1-hch@lst.de> <20180104080043.14506-32-hch@lst.de> <20180110081157.GA9659@lst.de> <20180110145948.GA17573@lst.de> <20180110154904.GB18707@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180110154904.GB18707@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:49:04PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:48:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Ok, fair enough. Given that the old version gets obsoleted by this > > one, it shouldn't get much uglier than it already is here when you > > start out with a regular timespec. We just need to be aware of possible > > clashes when we get the patches merged at the same time. > > I still hope to get this into 4.15. If it gets delayed and we > have a coherent 64-bit time_t abi around already I can reconsider > the decision. s/4.15/4.16/ of course.