* [PATCH] direct-io: Fix sleep in atomic due to sync AIO
@ 2018-02-26 11:51 Jan Kara
2018-02-26 15:31 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2018-02-26 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-fsdevel, Jan Kara, Christoph Hellwig,
Goldwyn Rodrigues, stable
Commit e864f39569f4 "fs: add RWF_DSYNC aand RWF_SYNC" added additional
way for direct IO to become synchronous and thus trigger fsync from the
IO completion handler. Then commit 9830f4be159b "fs: Use RWF_* flags for
AIO operations" allowed these flags to be set for AIO as well. However
that commit forgot to update the condition checking whether the IO
completion handling should be defered to a workqueue and thus AIO DIO
with RWF_[D]SYNC set will call fsync() from IRQ context resulting in
sleep in atomic.
Fix the problem by checking directly iocb flags (the same way as it is
done in dio_complete()) instead of checking all conditions that could
lead to IO being synchronous.
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
CC: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Fixes: 9830f4be159b29399d107bffb99e0132bc5aedd4
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/direct-io.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index a0ca9e48e993..1357ef563893 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1274,8 +1274,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
*/
if (dio->is_async && iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
retval = 0;
- if ((iocb->ki_filp->f_flags & O_DSYNC) ||
- IS_SYNC(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host))
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DSYNC)
retval = dio_set_defer_completion(dio);
else if (!dio->inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq) {
/*
--
2.13.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] direct-io: Fix sleep in atomic due to sync AIO
2018-02-26 11:51 [PATCH] direct-io: Fix sleep in atomic due to sync AIO Jan Kara
@ 2018-02-26 15:31 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2018-02-26 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig, Goldwyn Rodrigues,
stable
On Mon, Feb 26 2018, Jan Kara wrote:
> Commit e864f39569f4 "fs: add RWF_DSYNC aand RWF_SYNC" added additional
> way for direct IO to become synchronous and thus trigger fsync from the
> IO completion handler. Then commit 9830f4be159b "fs: Use RWF_* flags for
> AIO operations" allowed these flags to be set for AIO as well. However
> that commit forgot to update the condition checking whether the IO
> completion handling should be defered to a workqueue and thus AIO DIO
> with RWF_[D]SYNC set will call fsync() from IRQ context resulting in
> sleep in atomic.
>
> Fix the problem by checking directly iocb flags (the same way as it is
> done in dio_complete()) instead of checking all conditions that could
> lead to IO being synchronous.
Thanks, applied.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-26 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-26 11:51 [PATCH] direct-io: Fix sleep in atomic due to sync AIO Jan Kara
2018-02-26 15:31 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).