From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inode: don't memset the inode address space twice
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 17:32:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180307013245.GA19297@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180301223402.26897-1-david@fromorbit.com>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:34:02AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Noticed when looking at why cycling 600k inodes/s through the inode
> cache was taking a total of 8% cpu in memset() during inode
> initialisation. There is no need to zero the inode.i_data structure
> twice.
>
> This increases single threaded bulkstat throughput from ~200,000
> inodes/s to ~220,000 inodes/s, so we save a substantial amount of
> CPU time per inode init by doing this.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Looks ok, will test...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> ---
> fs/inode.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 6295f1415761..b153aeaa61ea 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -346,9 +346,8 @@ void inc_nlink(struct inode *inode)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_nlink);
>
> -void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
> +static void __address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
> {
> - memset(mapping, 0, sizeof(*mapping));
> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&mapping->page_tree, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> spin_lock_init(&mapping->tree_lock);
> init_rwsem(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
> @@ -356,6 +355,12 @@ void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
> spin_lock_init(&mapping->private_lock);
> mapping->i_mmap = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> }
> +
> +void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
> +{
> + memset(mapping, 0, sizeof(*mapping));
> + __address_space_init_once(mapping);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(address_space_init_once);
>
> /*
> @@ -371,7 +376,7 @@ void inode_init_once(struct inode *inode)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_io_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_wb_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_lru);
> - address_space_init_once(&inode->i_data);
> + __address_space_init_once(&inode->i_data);
> i_size_ordered_init(inode);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_init_once);
> --
> 2.16.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 22:34 [PATCH] inode: don't memset the inode address space twice Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 9:15 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-03-06 10:57 ` Jan Kara
2018-03-07 1:32 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180307013245.GA19297@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).