From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:58:50 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: "Besogonov, Aleksei" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , xfs Subject: Re: fallocate on XFS for swap Message-ID: <20180310005850.GW18129@dastard> References: <8C28C1CB-47F1-48D1-85C9-5373D29EA13E@amazon.com> <20180309234422.GA4860@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180309234422.GA4860@magnolia> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 03:44:22PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > [you really ought to cc the xfs list] > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:05:24PM +0000, Besogonov, Aleksei wrote: > > Hi! > > > > We’re working at Amazon on making XFS our default root filesystem for > > the upcoming Amazon Linux 2 (now in prod preview). One of the problems > > that we’ve encountered is inability to use fallocated files for swap > > on XFS. This is really important for us, since we’re shipping our > > current Amazon Linux with hibernation support . > > > > > I’ve traced the problem to bmap(), used in generic_swapfile_activate > > call, which returns 0 for blocks inside holes created by fallocate and > > Dave Chinner confirmed it in a private email. I’m thinking about ways > > to fix it, so far I see the following possibilities: > > > > 1. Change bmap() to not return zeroes for blocks inside holes. But > > this is an ABI change and it likely will break some obscure userspace > > utility somewhere. > > bmap is a horrible interface, let's leave it to wither and eventually go > away. > > > 2. Change generic_swap_activate to use a more modern interface, by > > adding fiemap-like operation to address_space_operations with fallback > > on bmap(). > > Probably the best idea, but see fs/iomap.c since we're basically leasing > a chunk of file space to the kernel. Leasing space to a user that wants > direct access is becoming rather common (rdma, map_sync, etc.) thing is, we don't want in-kernel users of fiemap. We've got other block mapping interfaces that can be used, such as iomap... > > 3. Add an XFS-specific implementation of swapfile_activate. > > Ugh no. What we want is an iomap-based re-implementation of generic_swap_activate(). One of the ways to plumb that in is to use ->swapfile_activate() like so: iomap_swapfile_activate() { return iomap_apply(... iomap_swapfile_add_extent, ...) } xfs_vm_swapfile_activate() { return iomap_swapfile_activate(xfs_iomap_ops); } .swapfile_activate = xfs_vm_swapfile_activate() And massage the swapfile_activate callout be friendly to fragmented files. i.e. change the nfs caller to run a "add_single_swap_extent()" caller rather than have to do it in the generic code on return.... IOWs, I think the choices we have are to either re-implement generic_swapfile_activate() and then be stuck with using get_block style interfaces forever in XFS, or we use the filesystem specific callout to implement more advanced generic support using the filesystem supplied get_block/iomap interfaces for block mapping like we do for everything else that the VM needs the filesystem to do.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com