Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel

[Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>]

On Wednesday, April 04/18/18, 2018 at 19:58:01 +0530, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wednesday, April 04/18/18, 2018 at 11:45:46 +0530, Dave Young wrote:
> >> Hi Rahul,
> >> On 04/17/18 at 01:14pm, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> >> > On production servers running variety of workloads over time, kernel
> >> > panic can happen sporadically after days or even months. It is
> >> > important to collect as much debug logs as possible to root cause
> >> > and fix the problem, that may not be easy to reproduce. Snapshot of
> >> > underlying hardware/firmware state (like register dump, firmware
> >> > logs, adapter memory, etc.), at the time of kernel panic will be very
> >> > helpful while debugging the culprit device driver.
> >> > 
> >> > This series of patches add new generic framework that enable device
> >> > drivers to collect device specific snapshot of the hardware/firmware
> >> > state of the underlying device in the crash recovery kernel. In crash
> >> > recovery kernel, the collected logs are added as elf notes to
> >> > /proc/vmcore, which is copied by user space scripts for post-analysis.
> >> > 
> >> > The sequence of actions done by device drivers to append their device
> >> > specific hardware/firmware logs to /proc/vmcore are as follows:
> >> > 
> >> > 1. During probe (before hardware is initialized), device drivers
> >> > register to the vmcore module (via vmcore_add_device_dump()), with
> >> > callback function, along with buffer size and log name needed for
> >> > firmware/hardware log collection.
> >> 
> >> I assumed the elf notes info should be prepared while kexec_[file_]load
> >> phase. But I did not read the old comment, not sure if it has been discussed
> >> or not.
> >> 
> >
> > We must not collect dumps in crashing kernel. Adding more things in
> > crash dump path risks not collecting vmcore at all. Eric had
> > discussed this in more detail at:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/24/319
> >
> > We are safe to collect dumps in the second kernel. Each device dump
> > will be exported as an elf note in /proc/vmcore.
> 
> It just occurred to me there is one variation that is worth
> considering.
> 
> Is the area you are looking at dumping part of a huge mmio area?
> I think someone said 2GB?
> 
> If that is the case it could be worth it to simply add the needed
> addresses to the range of memory we need to dump, and simply having a
> elf note saying that is what happened.
> 

We are _not_ dumping mmio area. However, one part of the dump
collection involves reading 2 GB on-chip memory via PIO access,
which is compressed and stored.

Thanks,
Rahul