linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksys_mount: check for permissions before resource allocation
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:53:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180605115340.GO30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E519BA2-4198-4255-BAE4-3125C59741A3@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:35:55PM +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> 
> > On Jun 5, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Jun 5, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Early check for mount permissions prevents possible allocation of 3
> >>> pages from kmalloc() pool by unpriveledged user which can be used for
> >>> spraying the kernel heap.
> > 
> > I'm sorry, but there are arseloads of unpriveleged syscalls that do the same,
> > starting with read() from procfs files.  So what the hell does it buy?
> 
> Means that if all do the same shit no reason to fix it? Sounds weird...

Fix *what*?  You do realize that there's no permission checks to stop e.g.
stat(2) from copying the pathname in, right?  With user-supplied contents,
even...

If you depend upon preventing kmalloc'ed temporary allocations filled
with user-supplied data, you are screwed, plain and simple.  It really can't
be prevented, in a lot of ways that are much less exotic than mount(2).
Most of syscall arguments are copied in, before we get any permission
checks.  It does happen and it will happen - examining them while they are
still in userland is a nightmare in a lot of respects, starting with
security.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-05 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <D2317950-0DB0-4311-ADB1-FF677B676E04@gmail.com>
2018-06-05  6:59 ` [PATCH] ksys_mount: check for permissions before resource allocation Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 11:26   ` Al Viro
2018-06-05 11:35     ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 11:53       ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-06-05 12:07         ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 12:28           ` David Sterba
2018-06-05 12:42             ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 12:34           ` Al Viro
2018-06-05 19:56   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-06  9:32     ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-06 14:22       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-06 15:26         ` Ilya Matveychikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180605115340.GO30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matvejchikov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).