From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksys_mount: check for permissions before resource allocation
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180605115340.GO30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E519BA2-4198-4255-BAE4-3125C59741A3@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:35:55PM +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
>
> > On Jun 5, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jun 5, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Early check for mount permissions prevents possible allocation of 3
> >>> pages from kmalloc() pool by unpriveledged user which can be used for
> >>> spraying the kernel heap.
> >
> > I'm sorry, but there are arseloads of unpriveleged syscalls that do the same,
> > starting with read() from procfs files. So what the hell does it buy?
>
> Means that if all do the same shit no reason to fix it? Sounds weird...
Fix *what*? You do realize that there's no permission checks to stop e.g.
stat(2) from copying the pathname in, right? With user-supplied contents,
even...
If you depend upon preventing kmalloc'ed temporary allocations filled
with user-supplied data, you are screwed, plain and simple. It really can't
be prevented, in a lot of ways that are much less exotic than mount(2).
Most of syscall arguments are copied in, before we get any permission
checks. It does happen and it will happen - examining them while they are
still in userland is a nightmare in a lot of respects, starting with
security.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-05 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <D2317950-0DB0-4311-ADB1-FF677B676E04@gmail.com>
2018-06-05 6:59 ` [PATCH] ksys_mount: check for permissions before resource allocation Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 11:26 ` Al Viro
2018-06-05 11:35 ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 11:53 ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-06-05 12:07 ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 12:28 ` David Sterba
2018-06-05 12:42 ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-05 12:34 ` Al Viro
2018-06-05 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-06 9:32 ` Ilya Matveychikov
2018-06-06 14:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-06 15:26 ` Ilya Matveychikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180605115340.GO30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matvejchikov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).