From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:42450 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964778AbeFOPZd (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:25:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 08:25:29 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Seth Forshee Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , James Bottomley , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tyler Hicks , Christian Brauner Subject: Re: shiftfs status and future development Message-ID: <20180615152529.GA23527@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180614184448.GC30028@ubuntu-xps13> <20180615135638.GA29299@mail.hallyn.com> <20180615145917.GF30028@ubuntu-xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180615145917.GF30028@ubuntu-xps13> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 09:59:17AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > - Supports any id maps possible for a user namespace Have we already ruled out storing the container's UID/GID/perms in an extended attribute, and having all the files owned by the owner of the container from the perspective of the unshifted fs. Then shiftfs reads the xattr and presents the files with the container's idea of what the UID is?