From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:55327 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966118AbeFOURd (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:17:33 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1fTvA4-0007EP-A1 for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 20:17:32 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f197.google.com with SMTP id f12-v6so8108566iob.11 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:17:28 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: James Bottomley Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tyler Hicks , Christian Brauner Subject: Re: shiftfs status and future development Message-ID: <20180615201728.GL30028@ubuntu-xps13> References: <20180614184448.GC30028@ubuntu-xps13> <1529076534.4048.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180615154641.GH30028@ubuntu-xps13> <1529080549.4048.14.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1529080549.4048.14.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 09:35:49AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 10:46 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > [...] > > Subject: [PATCH] shiftfs: Forward port to 4.17-rc6 > > > > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee > > --- > >  fs/shiftfs.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/shiftfs.c b/fs/shiftfs.c > > index ea8ac57b3ce1..fa0797bd7880 100644 > > --- a/fs/shiftfs.c > > +++ b/fs/shiftfs.c > > @@ -109,12 +109,12 @@ static void shiftfs_d_release(struct dentry > > *dentry) > >   > >  static struct dentry *shiftfs_d_real(struct dentry *dentry, > >        const struct inode *inode, > > -      unsigned int flags) > > +      unsigned int open_flag > > Well, that's an oopsie: I already have this change in my code base. I > think I probably did it at the last minute for a conference > presentation (the log indicates it was done in the 4.14 timeframe) and > then forgot to repost the patches, which would explain why it's still > nicely compiling for me ... > > I can repost so we've got code to hang the discussion on. That would be great, thanks! Seth