From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:40:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628164014.4925-6-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628164014.4925-1-jack@suse.cz>
Currently, the audit tree code does not make sure that when a chunk in
inserted into the hash table, it is fully initialized. So in theory (in
practice only on DEC Alpha) a user of RCU lookup could see uninitialized
structure in the hash table and crash. Add appropriate barriers between
initialization of the structure and its insertion into hash table.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
kernel/audit_tree.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index 89ad8857a578..46cc6d046c75 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -198,7 +198,11 @@ struct audit_chunk *audit_tree_lookup(const struct inode *inode)
struct audit_chunk *p;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, list, hash) {
- if (p->key == key) {
+ /*
+ * We use a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() to make sure
+ * the chunk we see is fully initialized.
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(p->key) == key) {
atomic_long_inc(&p->refs);
return p;
}
@@ -303,9 +307,15 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
list_replace_init(&chunk->owners[j].list, &new->owners[i].list);
}
- list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
owner->root = new;
+ /*
+ * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+ * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+ * audit_tree_lookup().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
@@ -367,6 +377,12 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
}
chunk->key = inode_to_key(inode);
+ /*
+ * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+ * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+ * audit_tree_lookup().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
insert_hash(chunk);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
@@ -458,7 +474,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
p->owner = tree;
get_tree(tree);
list_add(&p->list, &tree->chunks);
- list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
list_for_each_entry(owner, &chunk->trees, same_root)
owner->root = chunk;
old->dead = 1;
@@ -466,6 +481,13 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
tree->root = chunk;
list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
}
+ /*
+ * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+ * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+ * audit_tree_lookup().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
fsnotify_detach_mark(old_entry);
mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 16:40 [PATCH 0/6] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-06-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] audit_tree: Replace mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-06-29 11:31 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-03 14:07 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-06-29 11:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-02 6:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-07-03 14:18 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-06-29 12:05 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-03 14:21 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-03 17:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-04 8:28 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-06-29 12:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-03 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-28 16:40 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-06-29 13:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Amir Goldstein
2018-07-03 15:31 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] audit: Point to fsnotify mark instead of embedding it Jan Kara
2018-06-29 13:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-04 12:34 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-29 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/6] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Amir Goldstein
2018-06-29 18:01 ` Paul Moore
2018-07-03 14:14 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-03 17:03 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180628164014.4925-6-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).