From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:35404 "EHLO
        ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1728327AbeGMMOa (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:14:30 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:00:04 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+2349f5067b1772c1d8a5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set.
Message-ID: <20180713120004.GF30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <000000000000da8a9b0570a29c01@google.com>
 <0145d376-7ef8-3e17-5a24-94de946a01e5@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <7dc64116-f43d-3739-7b35-4eef7a80e343@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <5c3c26a9-c5ac-6f1c-1465-4127db1db9f7@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5c3c26a9-c5ac-6f1c-1465-4127db1db9f7@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 07:09:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> More simple version. Is this assumption correct?

Racy, for obvious reasons (sget/sget)