From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at fs/dcache.c:899
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:06:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180713160646.GG30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53129dac-48fd-df2e-bb6f-0a79c9776a74@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:33:37AM -0400, Peter Geis wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I have been trying to track down a bug that has been causing my Tegra3
> device to reboot while compiling.
> I finally managed to catch the offender, the details are below:
> The offending code is a triggered bug in dget_parent, the code is:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> BUG_ON(!ret->d_lockref.count);
> ret->d_lockref.count++;
Interesting... We call that while holding a reference to dentry (we'd better).
That code is
rcu_read_lock();
ret = dentry->d_parent;
ret won't get freed until after rcu_read_unlock, so spin_lock is safe here
spin_lock(&ret->d_lock);
if (unlikely(ret != dentry->d_parent)) {
spin_unlock(&ret->d_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
goto repeat;
}
Since we got through that, we have observed dentry->d_parent == ret with
ret->d_lock held.
rcu_read_unlock();
BUG_ON(!ret->d_lockref.count);
Now, this means that dentry->d_parent is *not* equal to ret anymore -
otherwise ret would remain pinned. The only place that changes
->d_parent of a live dentry is __d_move() - no other assignments
exist. __d_move() is done under rename_lock - it's globally serialized.
And it grabs ->d_lock on all parents involved before modifying ->d_parent
of anything, so the observed condition (ret == dentry->d_parent, ret->d_lock
held by us) can't change until we drop ret->d_lock...
Which kernel had that been? It looks either like a memory corruption (anywhere)
or as if you called that with dentry itself getting killed right under you.
Reference to ->d_parent is not dropped until after the last reference to
dentry goes away, so...
Could you slap
if (WARN_ON(!ret->d_lockref.count))
printk(KERN_ERR "child: %px[%ld], parent: %px:%px\n",
dentry, (long)dentry->d_lockref.count, dentry->d_parent, ret);
right before that rcu_read_unlock() and see if you can trigger that?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-13 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 15:33 [BUG] kernel BUG at fs/dcache.c:899 Peter Geis
2018-07-13 16:06 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180713160646.GG30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).