From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+121be635a7a35ddb7dcb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/userfaultfd.c:LINE! (2)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:12:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180718071230.GA4302@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180717192806.GI75957@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:28:06PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [+Cc userfaultfd developers and linux-mm]
>
> The reproducer hits the BUG_ON() in userfaultfd_release():
>
> BUG_ON(!!vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx ^
> !!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_MISSING | VM_UFFD_WP)));
Thanks for the CC.
The fix is below.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
>From 3711b6a72abe3796b2b97fdba8eadd995b29f195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:45:54 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: remove uffd flags from vma->vm_flags if
UFFD_EVENT_FORK fails
The fix in commit 0cbb4b4f4c44 ("userfaultfd: clear the
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx if UFFD_EVENT_FORK fails") cleared the
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx but kept userfaultfd flags in vma->vm_flags that
were copied from the parent process VMA.
As the result, there is an inconsistency between the values of
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx and vma->vm_flags which triggers BUG_ON in
userfaultfd_release().
Clearing the uffd flags from vma->vm_flags in case of UFFD_EVENT_FORK
failure resolves the issue.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+121be635a7a35ddb7dcb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 594d192b2331..bad9cea37f12 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -633,8 +633,10 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
/* the various vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx still points to it */
down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next)
- if (vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx == release_new_ctx)
+ if (vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx == release_new_ctx) {
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX;
+ vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MISSING);
+ }
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
userfaultfd_ctx_put(release_new_ctx);
--
2.7.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-16 0:19 kernel BUG at fs/userfaultfd.c:LINE! (2) syzbot
2018-07-17 19:28 ` Eric Biggers
2018-07-18 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180718071230.GA4302@rapoport-lnx \
--to=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=syzbot+121be635a7a35ddb7dcb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).