From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:44846 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727721AbeGSWaY (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:30:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 22:45:20 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 (v4.18 regression fix)] vfs: don't evict uninitialized inode Message-ID: <20180719214519.GA23379@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180706204521.29654-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20180718121833.GR30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180718121833.GR30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:18:33PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > BTW, why have you left generic_readlink() sitting around? AFAICS, > it could've been folded into the only remaining caller just as > you've made it static in late 2016... I'll fold it in; > just curious what was the reason for not doing that back then... BTW^2: const char *vfs_get_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct delayed_call *done) { const char *res = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); if (d_is_symlink(dentry)) { res = ERR_PTR(security_inode_readlink(dentry)); if (!res) res = inode->i_op->get_link(dentry, inode, done); } return res; } hits a method call that is not needed in the majority of cases. Is there any subtle reason why it shouldn't be const char *vfs_get_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct delayed_call *done) { const char *res = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); if (d_is_symlink(dentry)) { res = ERR_PTR(security_inode_readlink(dentry)); if (!res) res = inode->i_link; if (!res) res = inode->i_op->get_link(dentry, inode, done); } return res; } instead?