From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:34758 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726918AbeGTG5C (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2018 02:57:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:09:44 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Souptick Joarder Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , "Theodore Ts'o" , Bob Peterson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-fsdevel , LKML , Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig , Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: iomap: Change return type to vm_fault_t Message-ID: <20180720060944.GA4823@magnolia> References: <20180702154354.GA3919@jordon-HP-15-Notebook-PC> <20180703213943.GU32415@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:31:30AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:22 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > On 3 July 2018 at 23:39, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > >>> On 2 July 2018 at 17:43, Souptick Joarder wrote: > >>> > Return type has been changed to vm_fault_t type for > >>> > iomap_page_mkwrite(). > >>> > > >>> > see commit 1c8f422059ae ("mm: change return type to > >>> > vm_fault_t") for reference. > >>> > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder > >>> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox > >> > >> I don't recall Christoph [now cc'd] rescinding his NAK of the previous > >> version of this patch[1]. Has he changed his mind since May? > > /|\ > > Oops, a reply gone wrong -- I was me | to reply to Souptick > > Joarder's gfs2 change which I've add | the gfs2 for-next branch. > > Not the iomap change. Sorry for the | sion. > > | > >> [1] https://spinics.net/lists/linux | vel/msg126032.html > >> | > >> Now granted I didn't have a problem | the code (and applied the xfs > >> version to 4.18 after monitoring to | sfy myself that nothing > >> particularly weird happened during | but seeing as most of the iomap > >> changes have gone through hch's rev | nd landed via the xfs tree... | --D | | I wasn't planning on it, due to aforementioned NAK still being in place to the best of my knowledge, at least for the iomap patch. > Darrick, is this patch going to 4.19 through xfs tree ?