From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 01:21:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180802002121.GU30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730071544.23998-4-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 09:15:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +static void aio_poll_complete_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct poll_iocb *req = container_of(work, struct poll_iocb, work);
> + struct aio_kiocb *iocb = container_of(req, struct aio_kiocb, poll);
> + struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = req->events };
> + struct kioctx *ctx = iocb->ki_ctx;
> + __poll_t mask;
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(req->cancelled)) {
....
> + }
> +
> + mask = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & req->events;
> + if (!mask) {
> + add_wait_queue(req->head, &req->wait);
> + return;
> + }
....
> +}
> +/* assumes we are called with irqs disabled */
> +static int aio_poll_cancel(struct kiocb *iocb)
> +{
> + struct aio_kiocb *aiocb = container_of(iocb, struct aio_kiocb, rw);
> + struct poll_iocb *req = &aiocb->poll;
> +
> + spin_lock(&req->head->lock);
> + if (!list_empty(&req->wait.entry)) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(req->cancelled, true);
> + list_del_init(&req->wait.entry);
> + schedule_work(&aiocb->poll.work);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&req->head->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static int aio_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
> + void *key)
> +{
> + struct poll_iocb *req = container_of(wait, struct poll_iocb, wait);
> + __poll_t mask = key_to_poll(key);
> +
> + /* for instances that support it check for an event match first: */
> + if (mask && !(mask & req->events))
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_del_init(&req->wait.entry);
> + schedule_work(&req->work);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +static ssize_t aio_poll(struct aio_kiocb *aiocb, struct iocb *iocb)
> +{
> + struct kioctx *ctx = aiocb->ki_ctx;
> + struct poll_iocb *req = &aiocb->poll;
> + struct aio_poll_table apt;
> + __poll_t mask;
> + mask = vfs_poll(req->file, &apt.pt) & req->events;
> + if (mask || apt.error) {
> + } else {
> + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> + if (!req->done) {
> + list_add_tail(&aiocb->ki_list, &ctx->active_reqs);
> + aiocb->ki_cancel = aio_poll_cancel;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> + }
So what happens if
* we call aio_poll(), add the sucker to queue and see that we need
to wait
* add to ->active_refs just as the wakeup comes
* wakeup removes from queue and hits schedule_work()
* io_cancel() is called, triggering aio_poll_cancel(), which sees that
we are not from queue and buggers off. We are gone from ->active_refs.
* aio_poll_complete_work() is called, sees no ->cancelled
* aio_poll_complete_work() calls vfs_poll(), sees nothing interesting
and puts us back on the queue.
Unless I'm misreading it, cancel will end up with iocb still around and now
impossible to cancel... What am I missing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-02 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-30 7:15 aio poll and a new in-kernel poll API V21 (aka 2.0) Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-30 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] timerfd: add support for keyed wakeups Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-30 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] aio: add a iocb refcount Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-01 23:19 ` Al Viro
2018-08-02 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-30 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-01 23:54 ` Al Viro
2018-08-02 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-02 0:21 ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-08-02 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-02 16:00 ` Al Viro
2018-08-02 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-02 16:08 ` Al Viro
2018-08-02 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-02 21:48 ` Al Viro
2018-07-30 7:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] aio: allow direct aio poll comletions for keyed wakeups Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-06 8:30 aio poll V22 (aka 2.0) Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-06 8:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-26 8:28 aio poll and a new in-kernel poll API V20 (aka 2.0) Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-26 8:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180802002121.GU30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).