From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: check ->get_link return value
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:23:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002002332.GA6706@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181001235251.GA10425@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:52:51PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:45:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Teach callers of inode->i_op->get_link in the vfs code to check for a
> > NULL return value and return an error status instead of blindly
> > dereferencing the returned NULL pointer.
>
> Is that better than having the get_link method return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN) itself?
get_link doesn't need the EFSCORRUPTED return; all two of its callers
handle null pointer returns correctly and they don't return the ->get_link
return value directly to userspace.
It's just these two functions below whose callers assume they have to
deal an error pointer or that it's totally safe to dereference it.
--D
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/namei.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index 0cab6494978c..0744ab981fa0 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -4737,6 +4737,8 @@ int vfs_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen)
> > if (IS_ERR(link))
> > return PTR_ERR(link);
> > }
> > + if (!link)
> > + return -EUCLEAN;
> > res = readlink_copy(buffer, buflen, link);
> > do_delayed_call(&done);
> > return res;
> > @@ -4763,6 +4765,8 @@ const char *vfs_get_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct delayed_call *done)
> > res = ERR_PTR(security_inode_readlink(dentry));
> > if (!res)
> > res = inode->i_op->get_link(dentry, inode, done);
> > + if (!res)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN);
> > }
> > return res;
> > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-02 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-01 22:45 [PATCH] vfs: check ->get_link return value Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-01 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-01 23:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-01 23:53 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-01 23:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-02 0:23 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-02 1:54 ` Al Viro
2018-10-02 1:31 ` Al Viro
2018-10-02 2:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-02 2:47 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181002002332.GA6706@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).