From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:17:26 -0600 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: john.hubbard@gmail.com Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , Christopher Lameter , Dan Williams , Jan Kara , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , linux-rdma , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, John Hubbard , Al Viro , Jerome Glisse , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: introduce put_user_page[s](), placeholder versions Message-ID: <20181005151726.GA20776@ziepe.ca> References: <20181005040225.14292-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20181005040225.14292-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181005040225.14292-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 09:02:24PM -0700, john.hubbard@gmail.com wrote: > From: John Hubbard > > Introduces put_user_page(), which simply calls put_page(). > This provides a way to update all get_user_pages*() callers, > so that they call put_user_page(), instead of put_page(). > > Also introduces put_user_pages(), and a few dirty/locked variations, > as a replacement for release_pages(), for the same reasons. > These may be used for subsequent performance improvements, > via batching of pages to be released. > > This prepares for eventually fixing the problem described > in [1], and is following a plan listed in [2], [3], [4]. > > [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/753027/ : "The Trouble with get_user_pages()" > > [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180709080554.21931-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com > Proposed steps for fixing get_user_pages() + DMA problems. > > [3]https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180710082100.mkdwngdv5kkrcz6n@quack2.suse.cz > Bounce buffers (otherwise [2] is not really viable). > > [4] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003162115.GG24030@quack2.suse.cz > Follow-up discussions. > > CC: Matthew Wilcox > CC: Michal Hocko > CC: Christopher Lameter > CC: Jason Gunthorpe > CC: Dan Williams > CC: Jan Kara > CC: Al Viro > CC: Jerome Glisse > CC: Christoph Hellwig > Signed-off-by: John Hubbard > include/linux/mm.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index a61ebe8ad4ca..1a9aae7c659f 100644 > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ extern int overcommit_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, void __user *, > size_t *, loff_t *); > extern int overcommit_kbytes_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, void __user *, > size_t *, loff_t *); > +int set_page_dirty(struct page *page); > +int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page); > > #define nth_page(page,n) pfn_to_page(page_to_pfn((page)) + (n)) > > @@ -943,6 +945,44 @@ static inline void put_page(struct page *page) > __put_page(page); > } > > +/* Placeholder version, until all get_user_pages*() callers are updated. */ > +static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page) > +{ > + put_page(page); > +} > + > +/* For get_user_pages*()-pinned pages, use these variants instead of > + * release_pages(): > + */ > +static inline void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, > + unsigned long npages) > +{ > + while (npages) { > + set_page_dirty(pages[npages]); > + put_user_page(pages[npages]); > + --npages; > + } > +} Shouldn't these do the !PageDirty(page) thing? Jason